Category: Intermediate Chemistry

Mass spectrometry in the early days focuses on determining the charge-to-mass ratio, e/m, of an electron. This involves a few steps, beginning with the electric field turned on and the magnetic field turned off. The diagram below shows the mechanics of the electrons as they pass through the electric field plates.

An electric force, F_e, acts on an electron with charge, e, passing through the electric field, E, in the x-direction where

and gives the electron with mass, m, an acceleration, a:

Combining eq1 and eq2,

As the electric force acts only in the y-direction, the velocity of the electron in the x-direction remains constant at v_H. The velocity of the electron in the y-direction, v_V, is zero at the point where it enters the electric field and increases to a maximum value at the point where the electron leaves the electric field. This maximum value of v_V remains constant after the electron exits the electric field and is given by:

where S is the displacement of the electron in the y-direction, u is the initial velocity of the electron in the y-direction before entering the electric field (i.e. u = 0) and t is the time during which the electric force acts on the electron. In other words, t is the time taken for the electron to travel the length of the electric field plate, L. Therefore,

The trigonometric relationship between v_H and v_V after the electron leaves the electric field is:

The electric field strength is adjusted so that the angle of deflection is small. Therefore, tanθ ≈ θ and eq5 becomes,

The value of θ is recorded, leaving v_H  as the only unknown variable (in eq6) for the calculation of e/m. To determine v_H , the magnetic field, B, is turned on while the electric field is still on. Using Fleming’s left hand rule, the magnetic force, F_B, acts on the electron (at the point when the electron just enters the magnetic field from the left side) and deflects it in the negative y-direction:

The magnetic field is then adjusted to the extent that the angle of deflection of the cathode ray is zero, meaning F_e = F_B. Substituting eq1 and eq7 in F_e = F_B, we have:

Substitute eq8 in eq6

The values of all the variables on the right hand side of eq9 are now known and the charge-to-mass ratio e/m of the electron can be determined. The magnitude of e/m that Thomson obtained ranged from 0.7 x 10¹¹ C/kg to 2 x 10¹¹ C/kg. The currently accepted value is 1.758820024 x 10¹¹ C/kg.

Finally, in 1909, when Robert Millikan determined the charge of an electron via his famous oil drop experiment, the estimated mass of an electron was calculated.

 

next article: application, relative isotopic mass

Previous ArTicle: J.J. thomson’s cathode ray experiment

Content page of mass spectrometry

Content page of intermediate chemistry

Main content page

A mass spectrometer measures the mass of an isotope relative to that of carbon-12 by analysing the ratio of the ionised isotope’s deflection to the ionised carbon-12’s deflection.

From eq9, we have:

Assume both ions are univalent so that  and divide eq11 by eq10:

Therefore,

We can also represent eq13 in the form

where we have replaced e with the notation z. The output of eq14 is a value with unit of unified atomic mass unit, u, since the ratio is unit-less while .

Finally, we divide the output of eq14 by 1u to obtain the relative isotopic mass, which is a dimensionless quantity that is defined as the ratio of the mass of an isotope in unified atomic mass unit to one unified atomic mass unit.

 

 

Next ArTicle: Modern mass spectrometer design

Previous ArTicle: the mechanics

Content page of Mass spectrometry

Content page of intermediate chemistry

Main content page

Mass spectrometry is an analytical technique that makes use of an instrument called a mass spectrometer to identify and quantify ions based on their mass-to-charge ratios. J. J. Thomson, an English physicist, constructed one of the earliest mass spectrometers (see diagram below) and demonstrated in an experiment in 1897 that atoms are made of subatomic particles called electrons. Using the spectrometer, he determined the charge-to-mass ratio of an electron.

The ioniser on the left of the spectrometer is not a complete vacuum but filled with a trace amount of air molecules, which are always in equilibrium between their neutral and ionic forms due to natural occurring processes like photoionisation. Consequently, free electrons are present amongst the trace amount of air molecules in the ioniser.

Instead of producing electrons from the cathode via a heated filament, the ioniser works on the principle of a ‘cold cathode’, where a high potential difference maintained between the cathode and anode accelerates the free electrons present in the trace amount of air. These electrons collide with other gas molecules and knock more electrons off them, creating a cascade of ions and electrons called a Townsend discharge. The electrons are attracted towards the anode where they are sharpened to a beam called a cathode ray and continue their way to the electric field plates and electromagnet where they are deflected.

When the electrons eventually strike the atoms in the glass at the right end of the spectrometer, they excite electrons intrinsic to the atoms to a higher energy state. When these excited electrons relax back to the ground state, they emit light in the form of fluorescence and the angle of deflection, θ, can be read off the fluorescent spot on the scale.

Working out the mechanics of the trajectory of the cathode ray, Thomson managed to calculate the charge-to-mass ratio of an electron and concluded that the negatively charged ‘corpuscles’ (the term he used back then for electrons) must have come from the dissociation of the trace amount of gas molecules, since the charge-to-mass ratio of a corpuscle is about 1,700 times that for a charged hydrogen atom (the charge-to-mass ratio of a hydrogen ion had been investigated earlier on).

 

next article: The mechanics

Content page of Mass spectrometry

Content page of intermediate chemistry

Main content page

Perrin needed to prove that N_A is a constant in the following equation that he had derived:

The problem was that N’, N and m could not be measured directly. He circumvented the problem by replacing the gas in the cylinder with visible particles suspended in a liquid. Drawing from the principles of Brownian motion, Perrin assumed that collisions between liquid molecules and the visible particles would result in the particles being distributed in the same way as gas molecules were distributed in the cylinder. He also assumed that the motion of the particles obeyed the ideal gas law.

Perrin used a monodisperse colloid of a gum called gamboge comprising thousands of gamboge spheres in a water cylinder. He studied the distribution of the spheres with a microscope and made an adjustment to eq9, taking into account the upthrust by water on the gamboge spheres. For a single gamboge sphere (“particle”),

upthrust = weight of liquid displaced = m_l g = dV_l g                (10)

where m_l is the mass of the liquid displaced, d is the density of the liquid and V_l is the volume of the liquid displaced. Furthermore, the volume of liquid displaced is equal to the volume of the particle, V_p :

V_l = V_p                (11)

Substitute eq11 in eq10,

upthrust = dV_p g               (12)

Since V_p = m/D, where m is the mass of a particle and D is the density of the particle, eq 12 becomes:

The effective weight of the particle is therefore the difference between the weight of the particle and the upthrust on the particle:

Substituting the weight of a gas molecule in eq9, mg, with the effective weight of a suspended particle, we have:

The suspended particles must be heavier than the liquid molecules for the particles to push down on the liquid molecules to produce an upthrust, resulting in the particles having a lower effective weight. This means that d < D for eq14 to be valid. Hence, the choice of particle material is important.

Perrin meticulously prepared emulsions containing particles that were equal in size. He calculated the average mass of a particle by weighing a specified number of particles, determined its density in different ways (including the specific gravity bottle method) and counted the number of suspended particles per unit volume at various heights using a microscope.

After repeating the experiment with different particle material (e.g. mastic), sizes, masses, liquids and temperatures, he found that the value of N_A remained fairly constant and reported numbers ranging from 6.5 x 10²³ to 7.2 x 10²³. He further conducted experiments using methods based on radioactivity, blackbody radiation and the motion of ions in liquids and obtained very similar results for the value of N_A. Perrin concluded that the results justified the hypotheses that had guided him, including Avogadro’s law, and named the constant the Avogadro constant, in honour of Avogadro.

The accuracy of the value of the Avogadro constant was subsequently improved by other scientists, one of whom is Robert Millikan.

Previous ArTicle: the concept

Content page of Perrin’s experiment

Content page of intermediate chemistry

Main content page

Perrin developed the concept to analyse the vertical distribution of a volume of molecules of an ideal gas, with total mass of m_c, in a cylinder of cross-sectional area, A, and small height, h, at temperature, T. Firstly, he considered an infinitesimal layer of the gas of mass, dm_c, and thickness, dh, in the cylinder.

This layer of gas experiences an upward force, F_u = pA, from the pressure exerted by the gas below the layer, and a downward force, F_d = gdm_c + (p+dp)A, as a result of the gravitational force and the pressure exerted by the gas above the layer. At equilibrium, F_u = F_d and we get:

At this juncture, Perrin, with reference to the works of previous scientists (Avogadro, Dalton, etc.) on relative mass of molecules, introduced an important definition:

A gram-molecule, M, is the mass of a gas that occupies the same volume as 2g of hydrogen gas at the same temperature and pressure*

* Perrin’s definition of the gram-molecule is somewhat similar to the 1967 definition of the mole. This definition, together with Avogadro’s law, implies that a gram-molecule of gas X and a gram-molecule of gas Y have the same number of molecules.

With Perrin’s definition, the physical state of the gas in the cylinder can be described using the ideal gas law (eq2), where the amount of gas n is expressed in multiples of gram-molecule M:

Substituting eq4 in eq3 by eliminating dm_c/A :

The expression for the distribution of the gas in the entire cylinder can be obtained by integrating both sides of eq5 (see above diagram):

Using eq2 again where p’ = n’RT/V’ and p = nRT/V and substituting them in eq6, we have:

where N’ = n’/V’ and N = n/V, i.e. the number densities of the gas at the upper and lower levels of the cylinder.

Furthermore, the gram-molecule of the gas, M, is equal to the number of molecules in a gram-molecule, N_A, multiplied by the mass of a molecule of the gas, m:

Substituting eq8 in eq7, we have

If Avogadro’s hypothesis that ‘equal volumes of all gases at the same temperature and pressure have the same number of molecules’ is true, N_A in eq9 must be constant for different ideal gases. To determine the value of N_A, Perrin in principle needed to perhaps count the number of molecules per unit volume at the upper and lower levels of the cylinder (of fixed height, h, at a constant temperature, T) for a particular gas and repeat the count for other gases with different m, and calculate the average value of N_A. However, a problem arose.

 

next article: The experiment

Previous ArTicle: John perrin

Content page of Perrin’s experiment

Content page of intermediate chemistry

Main content page

Jean Perrin, a French scientist, was one of the earlier scientists who attempted to determine the Avogadro constant.

Who inspired Perrin?

Prior to Perrin’s work in 1909, Amedeo Avogadro, an Italian scientist, published papers between 1811 and 1841 and suggested that

Equal volumes of all gases at the same temperature and pressure have the same number of molecules

This became known as Avogadro’s law. It implies that for a given mass of an ideal gas at constant temperature and pressure, the ideal gas’ volume V is directly proportional to its amount n, i.e.

V = kn                 (1)

where k is the proportionality constant. When eq1 is incorporated into the combined gas law, which was developed many years earlier, we have the ideal gas law:

pV = nRT                 (2)

n at that time is known as ‘amount of gas’ and not ‘number of moles’ as the mole concept has not been developed. Since the amount of gas can be in measured in different ways, the gas constant R has different units back then. 

Avogadro also investigated the relative mass of different gases, e.g. he deduced from gas density data that the relative molecular weight of nitrogen and hydrogen is in the ratio of 13.2 : 1 and that the ratio of oxygen molecules and hydrogen molecules in water is 0.5 : 1.

Lastly, the research of a botanist (in 1827), Robert Brown, that involves the random motion of particles suspended in a liquid or a gas as a result of their collision with the liquid or gas molecules respectively, also played an important role in Perrin’s calculations.

next article: The concept

Content page of Perrin’s experiment

Content page of intermediate chemistry

Main content page

Mass is the quantity of matter that a physical body contains. In daily life, we measure almost all things using the concept of inertia mass, which is a measure of a body’s resistance to acceleration. Such measurements are made in relation to the kilogram, which is now defined by the Planck constant. Prior to Nov 2018, the kilogram was defined by the mass of a platinum alloy cylinder called the international prototype kilogram (IPK) that was stored in France. The IPK contains octillions of atoms and has inevitably gained or lost mass over time through oxidation. Therefore, it cannot be used to accurately measure the mass of atoms.

To circumvent this problem, scientists decided to measure the mass of an atom or isotope with reference to that of another atom or isotope, just as mass of daily objects were measured relative to that of the IPK. The question then is which isotope to choose as the reference mass and why.

 

next article: unified atomic mass unit

Content page of mass in chemistry

Content page of intermediate chemistry

Main content page

An atom is made up of protons, neutrons and electrons, with almost all of its mass equal to the combined masses of the protons and neutrons. Since the relative masses of a proton and a neutron are very similar, it is logical to select a reference isotope whose nucleus has equal number of protons and neutrons. A few candidates like ²H, ⁴He and ¹²C immediately come to mind. ¹²C was eventually chosen in 1961 because it has more equal number of protons and neutrons, six each, than the other two isotopes and therefore provides a better average of the relative mass of a nucleon. Furthermore, it has high relative isotopic abundance that makes it easier to isolate for measurement. Another reason is that ¹²C was already employed as a reference standard in mass spectrometry before it was chosen. 

Hence, ¹²C was arbitrarily assigned a value of exactly twelve unified atomic mass units or 12 u. All seems in order after the definition, but how is the carbon-12 unified atomic mass unit scale relevant to a chemist who is more familiar with calculating and measuring the inertia mass of macroscopic amounts of chemicals in the laboratory?

 

next article: the link to inertia mass

previous article: What is mass?

Content page of mass in chemistry

Content page of intermediate chemistry

Main content page

How do you weigh an atom?

As mentioned in the earlier sections, the mass of an atom is measured on the unified atomic mass unit scale. This is carried out in a mass spectrometer with carbon-12 as a standard reference. For example, mass spectrometric data for the ratio of the mass-to-charge ratio (u/z) of ²H to that of ¹²C is 0.167842. Thus, the mass of ²H on the carbon-12 unified atomic mass unit scale is:

Using eq2, the mass of one ²H is 2.014104 x 1.660539 x 10^-27 = 3.3450 x 10^-27 kg.

The conversion from u to kg is based on eq2, which is dependent on the uncertainty in the Avogadro constant prior to Nov 2018. However, the molar mass of ²H, which is equal to 2.0141 g, is not. This is shown by substituting eq1 in eq6,

Multiplying both sides by N_A,

where the RHS of eq7 is independent of N_A.

This is why the molar mass of another isotope, silicon-28, is used in determining the Avogadro constant in X-ray diffraction experiments. Furthermore, it is simpler to present the mass of an atom or isotope in the form of relative isotopic mass, which is a dimensionless quantity defined as the ratio of the mass of an isotope in unified atomic mass unit to one unified atomic mass unit. The table below lists the relative masses of isotopes of the first few elements in the periodic table:

Atomic no. (Z)	Mass no. (A)	Symbol	Relative isotopic mass*
1	1	1H	1.007825
	2	2H	2.014104
2	3	3He	3.016029
	4	4He	4.002603
3	6	6Li	6.015122
4	9	9Be	9.012182
5	10	10B	10.012937
	11	11B	11.009305
6	12	12C	12.000000
8	16	16O	15.994915
	17	17O	16.999132
	18	18O	17.999160
9	19	19F	18.998403
10	20	20Ne	19.992440
	21	21Ne	20.993847
	22	22Ne	21.991386

*With the new definition of the Avogadro constant, the mass of an atom in kg is no longer subject to the uncertainty of the Avogadro constant, but is contingent on the uncertainty in the value of the molar mass constant, since . However, the relative masses of isotopes remain unchanged. 

 

next article: definitions of mass in chemistry

previous article: the link to inertia mass

Content page of mass in chemistry

Content page of intermediate chemistry

Main content page