p-orbital

A p-orbital, defined by the quantum number , is a dumbbell-shaped region of space around the nucleus where an electron is most likely to be found. The letter ”p” is of spectroscopic origin, standing for ‘principal’.

One-electron p-orbital wavefunctions can be expressed using the total wavefunction of a hydrogenic atom:

where

, the radial wavefunction, is the radial component of .
, the spherical harmonics, is the angular component of .
are the associated Laguerre polynomials.
are the associated Legendre polynomials.
is the normalisation constant of the radial wavefunction.
is the normalisation constant of the spherical harmonics.
is the principal quantum number, where
is the orbital angular momentum quantum number (also known as azimuthal quantum number), where and .
is the magnetic quantum number, where .

The principal quantum number, , is also called a shell. Since when , there are three p-orbitals that are characterised by the set of quantum numbers  of , and in each shell for . Each of the three p-orbitals has an angular node. Consider the set . Substituting these values into the explicit formula for  yields:

where .

Converting from spherical coordinates to Cartesian coordinates, where , gives

Eq474 is known as the orbital. When , the wavefunction is zero everywhere in the -plane, which is known as the nodal plane.

For the sets and , we have  and , respectively. These two wavefunctions include the factor , which may complicate calculations when they undergo symmetry operations. Therefore, we take linear combinations of these wavefunctions to form simpler wavefunctions. The first linear combination is , which normalises to , or equivalently in Cartesian coordinates:

since .

The second normalised linear combination is , or equivalently,

since .

and , like , each have an angular node.

 

Question

If and are already normalised, why do we need to normalise a linear combination of them? How do we normalise a linear combination of and ?

Answer

When forming a linear combination of normalised wavefunctions, the result is not necessarily normalised. Consider a general linear combination , where and are coefficients. The normalisation condition for requires that , where  represents the volume element in spherical coordinates. Expanding and noting that and are orthonormal, we have . If , which is the case for the two linear combinations of and , will not be normalised.

To normalise , we have  or

Using (see this article for proof) and some basic trigonometry identities yields

Setting and gives .

 

 

Next article: d-orbital
Previous article: s-orbital
Content page of quantum mechanics
Content page of advanced chemistry
Main content page

d-orbital

A d-orbital, defined by the quantum number , is a region of space around the nucleus where an electron is most likely to be found. The letter ”d” is of spectroscopic origin, standing for ‘diffuse’.

One-electron d-orbital wavefunctions can be expressed using the total wavefunction of a hydrogenic atom:

where

, the radial wavefunction, is the radial component of .
, the spherical harmonics, is the angular component of .
are the associated Laguerre polynomials.
are the associated Legendre polynomials.
is the normalisation constant of the radial wavefunction.
is the normalisation constant of the spherical harmonics.
is the principal quantum number, where
is the orbital angular momentum quantum number (also known as azimuthal quantum number), where and .
is the magnetic quantum number, where .

The principal quantum number, , is also called a shell. Since when , there are five d-orbitals that are characterised by the set of quantum numbers  of , , , and in each shell for . Four of the five d-orbitals have cloverleaf shapes, while the fifth has a lobular structure along the -axis with a doughnut-shaped region around the equatorial plane. Each of the five d-orbitals has two angular nodes. Consider the set . Substituting these values into the explicit formula for  yields:

where .

Converting from spherical coordinates to Cartesian coordinates, where , gives

Eq478 is known as the wavefunction for the orbital. When or , . Therefore, the wavefunction is zero at in spherical coordinates. This implies that the angular nodes occur at two conical surfaces with their apices at the origin, extending at along the -axis.

For the sets and , we have  and , respectively. These two wavefunctions include the factor , which may complicate calculations when they undergo symmetry operations. Therefore, we take linear combinations of these wavefunctions to form simpler wavefunctions. The first linear combination is , which normalises to , or equivalently in Cartesian coordinates:

where and .

when or . This implies that has two nodal planes:  and .

 

Question

If and are already normalised, why do we need to normalise a linear combination of them? How do we normalise a linear combination of and ?

Answer

When forming a linear combination of normalised wavefunctions, the result is not necessarily normalised. Consider a general linear combination , where and are coefficients. The normalisation condition for requires that , where  represents the volume element in spherical coordinates. Expanding and noting that and are orthonormal, we have . If , which is the case for the two linear combinations of and , will not be normalised.

To normalise , we have  or

Since and ,

Using (see this article for proof) and setting and gives .

 

The second normalised linear combination is , or equivalently,

where and .

when or . This implies that has two nodal planes:  and .

For the remaining sets and , we apply the same logic to give and , where . when or , which implies two diagonal nodal planes. when or , which implies two nodes described by the planes and .

 

Next article: f-orbital
Previous article: p-orbital
Content page of quantum mechanics
Content page of advanced chemistry
Main content page

f-orbital

An f-orbital, defined by the quantum number , is a region of space around the nucleus where an electron is most likely to be found. The letter ”f” is of spectroscopic origin, standing for ‘fundamental’. f-block elements have either hexagonal close pack, cubic close pack or body centred cubic structures. For non-cubic symmetry systems, we describe them using a general set of orbitals, which are derived in the same way as the d-orbitals. For cubic symmetry systems, they are better described by another set of f-orbitals known as the cubic set, which are derived by taking a different set of linear combinations. Both sets are eigenfunctions of the Schrödinger equation.

One-electron f-orbital wavefunctions can be expressed using the total wavefunction of a hydrogenic atom:

where

, the radial wavefunction, is the radial component of .
, the spherical harmonics, is the angular component of .
are the associated Laguerre polynomials.
are the associated Legendre polynomials.
is the normalisation constant of the radial wavefunction.
is the normalisation constant of the spherical harmonics.
is the principal quantum number, where
is the orbital angular momentum quantum number (also known as azimuthal quantum number), where and .
is the magnetic quantum number, where .

 

General set

The principal quantum number, , is also called a shell. Since when , there are seven f-orbitals that are characterised by the set of quantum numbers  of , , , , , and in each shell for . Each of the seven f-orbitals has three angular nodes. Consider the set . Substituting these values into the explicit formula for  yields:

where .

Converting from spherical coordinates to Cartesian coordinates, where , gives

Eq482 is known as the orbital. When or or , . represents the nodal plane, while implies that the angular nodes occur at two conical surfaces with their apices at the origin, extending at along the -axis.

For the sets and , we have  and , respectively. These two wavefunctions include the factor , which may complicate calculations when they undergo symmetry operations. Therefore, we take linear combinations of these wavefunctions to form simpler wavefunctions. The first linear combination is , which normalises to , or equivalently in Cartesian coordinates:

where , and .

One angular node occurs at  or when , which represents the -nodal-plane. The second and third angular nodes correspond to . These nodes are described by two conical surfaces with their apices at the origin, extending at along the -axis.

The second normalised linear combination is , or equivalently,

where .

One angular node occurs at , which represents the -nodal plane. The second and third angular nodes correspond to . These nodes are described by two conical surfaces with their apices at the origin, extending at along the -axis.

 

Question

If and are already normalised, why do we need to normalise a linear combination of them? How do we normalise a linear combination of and ?

Answer

When forming a linear combination of normalised wavefunctions, the result is not necessarily normalised. Consider a general linear combination , where and are coefficients. The normalisation condition for requires that , where  represents the volume element in spherical coordinates. Expanding and noting that and are orthonormal, we have . If , which is the case for the two linear combinations of and , will not be normalised.

To normalise , we have  or

Using (see this article for proof),  and setting and gives .

 

For the remaining sets , , and , we apply the same logic to give:

Wavefunction Angular nodes

-plane

-planes

-plane

-plane

-plane

-plane

-planes

-plane

-planes

 

Cubic set

Out of the seven cubic f-orbitals, three of them, ,  and are the same as the general set of f-orbitals. The other four derived by taking different linear combinations of general set of f -orbitals. They are:

Linear combination Normalised wavefunction Angular nodes

-plane

Conical surfaces with apices at the origin, extending along the -axis

-plane

Conical surfaces with apices at the origin, extending along the -axis

-plane

-planes

-plane

-planes

 

Question
    1. How do we know which set of linear combinations result in the cubic set of wavefunctions?
    2. How do we determine the angular nodes of ?
Answer
    1. The linear combinations that give the cubic set of wavefunctions must transform according to the point group.
    2. The angular nodes occur when , which implies that or . Obviously, corresponds to the -nodal-plane. , which states that increases as increases in spherical coordinates, represents two conical surfaces with their apices at the origin. Substituting gives . When (along the -axis), the angles that the conical surfaces make with the -axis are .

 

Previous article: d-orbital
Content page of quantum mechanics
Content page of advanced chemistry
Main content page

Binomial theorem and the binomial series

The binomial theorem (or binomial expansion) expresses how to expand the power of a sum of two variables into a series of terms involving the individual powers of each variable, with coefficients determined by their positions in the expansion.

In general, the binomial expansion of  is

where are variables, and are non-negative integers and are the binomial coefficients.

The binomial theorem can be proven by induction. For , we have

If the theorem holds for all when , then for ,

Substituting for the first summation yields . Changing the index from back to gives

 

Question

Show that .

Answer

 

Therefore,

and the theorem holds for all and .

The binomial theorem defines . This is evident from eq319, where

The binomial series, on the other hand, is a more general concept where  can be any real number, including negative and fractional values. If one of the variables in eq319 is equal to one and the absolute value of the other variable is less than one, the binomial series provides a way to express an infinite series that converges:

 

Next article: Leibniz’s theorem
Previous article: Planck radiation law
Content page of quantum mechanics
Content page of advanced chemistry
Main content page

Generating function for the Legendre Polynomials

The generating function for the Legendre polynomials is a mathematical tool that, when expanded as a power series, produces Legendre polynomials as its coefficients in terms of a variable.

Legendre polynomials often arise in problems involving spherical harmonics. An example (see diagram above) is the multipole expansion . As the two points and the angle between them form a triangle, the Legendre polynomials are related to the cosine rule , which can be rearranged to

where and .

Since , we have and hence . This implies that we can expand the RHS of eq343 as a binomial series:

The coefficients of are the Legendre polynomials. Therefore, the generating function for the Legendre polynomials is

 

Next article: Recurrence relations of the Legendre polynomials
Previous article: Legendre polynomials
Content page of quantum mechanics
Content page of advanced chemistry
Main content page

Recurrence relations of the Legendre Polynomials

The recurrence relations of the Legendre polynomials describe how each polynomial in the sequence can be obtained from its predecessors.

Some useful recurrence relations of the Legendre polynomials include

where .

To derive these relations, we differentiate eq345 with respect to and to give

and

respectively.

Substituting eq345 in eq346f yields

Equating the coefficents of gives

Substituting eq346e in eq346f results in . When we equate the coefficients of in this equation, we get eq346b. Combining eq346b and eq346g gives eq346a. Substracting eq346b from eq346a yields eq346c.

The last recurrence relation is obtained by substituting eq345 in eq346e to give . Expanding and equating coefficients of , we have eq346d.

 

Next article: Rodrigues’ formula of the Legendre polynomials
Previous article: Generating function for the Legendre polynomials
Content page of quantum mechanics
Content page of advanced chemistry
Main content page

Rodrigues’ formula of the Legendre Polynomials

The Rodrigues’ formula for the Legendre polynomials is a mathematical expression that provides a method to calculate any Legendre polynomial using differentiation.

It is given by

with the first few Legendre polynomials being .

To derive eq348, let . The derivative of with respect to is or equivalently,

Using Leibniz’s theorem to differentiate eq349 by times with respect to gives

Comparing eq350 with eq332 reveals that is a solution to the Legendre differential equation. However, this solution does not produce the conventional Legendre polynomials of and so on.

 

Question

Prove by induction that for , and hence, .

Answer

For , we have . Assuming that is true, then,

So, holds for all . Similarly, . If we let , then .

 

To derive the factor in eq348, we again use Leibniz’s theorem to find the -th derivative of with respect to :

If we evaluate at , only the term in survives because the binomial theorem defines , resulting in

Since the conventional Legendre polynomials are defined by the condition , the solution to the Legendre differential equation in terms of must be , which is equivalent to eq348.

 

Next article: Orthogonality of the Legendre polynomials
Previous article: REcurrence relations of the Legendre polynomials
Content page of quantum mechanics
Content page of advanced chemistry
Main content page

Leibniz’s theorem

Leibniz’s theorem extends the product rule to determine higher-order derivatives of the product of two or more functions.

Consider the function , where and are times differentiable. Using the product rule, the first few derivatives are:

which suggests that the -th order derivative of can be expressed as the binomial expansion

where and are non-negative integers, and  are the -th order derivatives of and , respectively, and are the binomial coefficients.

Eq319a is known as Leibniz’s theorem, which can be proven by induction as follows:

For ,

If eq319a holds for all when , then for ,

Since (see this article for proof),

and the theorem holds for all and .

 

Next article: Legendre polynomials
Previous article: Binomial theorem and binomial series
Content page of quantum mechanics
Content page of advanced chemistry
Main content page

Normalisation constant of the Legendre polynomials

The normalisation constant ensures that the Legendre polynomials are properly scaled, thereby maintaining the probabilistic interpretation of quantum states.

To determine the normalisation constant, we square both sides of the generating function of the Legendre polynomials and integrate the expression with respect to to give

 

Question

Why are the limits of integration from -1 to 1?

Answer

The Legendre polynomials are used to describe spherical harmonics, where and . Therefore, the Legendre polynomials are analysed within the interval of .

 

Expanding the RHS of eq355 and using the orthogonality of Legendre polynomials,

Substituting and integrating gives

Since , we can expand and as two Taylor series, where and , to yield

To satisfy the above equation for all , all coefficients must be zero. Therefore,

where we have changed the dummy index from to .

Using the orthogonal property of the Legendre polynomials, we can also express eq356 as

Normalising the Legendre polynomials to 1,

Substituting eq356 in the above equation, we have. With reference to eq342, the normalised Legendre polynomials are

where for the even series, for the odd series.

 

Next article: Associated Legendre polynomials
Previous article: Orthogonality of the Legendre polynomials
Content page of quantum mechanics
Content page of advanced chemistry
Main content page

Orthogonality of the Legendre polynomials

The orthogonality of the Legendre polynomials can be proven using the Legendre differential equation.

If and are solutions to eq332a, then

Multiplying eq351 and eq352 by and , respectively, and subtracting the results yields

The Legendre polynomials are used to describe spherical harmonics, where and . Therefore, the orthogonality of the Legendre polynomials is analysed within the interval of . Integrating eq353 with respect to gives

If , the factor  is not zero, and hence

 

Next article: Normalisation constant of the Legendre polynomials
Previous article: Rodrigues’ formula of the Legendre polynomials
Content page of quantum mechanics
Content page of advanced chemistry
Main content page
Mono Quiz